-

Alpha Chi Sigma ceremony manual

From Wikileaks

Jump to: navigation, search

Unless otherwise specified the document described here:

  • Was first publicly revealed by Wikileaks working with our source.
  • At that time was classified, confidential, censored or otherwise withheld from the public.
  • Is of political, diplomatic, ethical or historical significance.
  • Any questions about this document's veracity are noted.
  • The summary is approved by the editorial board.

Talk to others about this document, join our chat.

To sponsor reportage of this document by mainstream journalists submit a targeted donation.

For press enquiries, see our media kit.

If you have similar or updated material ACT NOW.

For an explanation of the page you are looking at please look here.

October 25, 2008
File

alpha-chi-sigma-ceremonies.pdf
Download from: Sweden, US, Sweden2, Latvia, Slovakia, UK, Finland, Netherlands, Poland, Tonga, Europe, SSL, TOR

Context
United States
Other
Alpha Chi Sigma
Primary language
English
File size in bytes
2102085
File type information
PDF document, version 1.3
Cryptographic identity
SHA256 72446014c576ab751ff42b4be8faa0dd2d2dec539296960b6b4142f31b5b0f53
Description (as provided by the original submitter)

1. File has not been released anywhere to the best of my knowledge.

2. File contains secret initiation ceremony of Alpha-Chi-Sigma chemistry fraternity. Nothing strikes me as blatantly illegal, but the document seems to suggest this fraternity values mysticism as much as they value science. Also, I found it interesting that Allah is mentioned more than a few times. Finally, the document gives insight into what goes on in these "secret" organizations in general.

3. Primary audience is probably scientists or students.

4. All instances of the fraternity's name/letters have been removed from the document and replaced by blanks. However, in part 9 page 5 the name "Adelphoi Chemeean Sopheea" appears - presumably this is an oversight, as it gives away the name of the fraternity. Document is authentic, due to the organization's secrecy verification may be difficult.

5. Document was obtained in electronic format by a non-member in late 2007. Poor security measures are partly to blame for the leak. Document was being distributed for an upcoming initiation ceremony.

6. Document does not need to be published urgently. It actually looks quite old, but is apparently the version that the fraternity still uses.

A few of the pages are very low quality but still legible.



Know something about this material? Tell the world.
(see other comments first)

Personal tools